Dating

Is the data on which the secular Milankovitch theory of climate forcing saved by a 1997 paper?

Why is Homo heidelbergensis so much younger than previously thought?

How did the development of deep time in 18th century France affect Britain?

All dating methods involve making assumptions. But many scientific dating methods, with reasonable assumptions, do not support deep time and an old universe. Hundreds of dating methods support a young earth and recent creation of the universe.

The Bible provides the foundations for the answers

Archaeologists discover a spear point “9000 years old”? But it’s far older than either the biblical date for the Flood or Creation. What are the answers?

Radiohalos are the result of nuclear decay. They provide powerful evidence that the earth is young and radiometric dating is highly inaccurate.

Space probe Rosetta finds oxygen gas found in coma of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko

When the numbers don’t add up, it’s time to examine the methods and the philosophy behind them.

Analysis of wood samples from Tertiary rocks yielded significant carbon-14 indicating the wood was only thousands of years old, not millions.

Tree trunks engulfed by molten lava couldn’t survive could they? Here’s evidence that they did!

A simple analogy illustrating the differences between methods of determining past events.

Carbon-14 in Diamonds is still a problem for evolutionists.

Trees are among the oldest living things on the planet. Some say longer than biblical Creation would allow. Dendrochronology is the science dealing with the study of the rings of trees in determining the dates and chronological order of past events. Learn why it is a help rather than a hindrance to the biblical chronology.

Helium gas is renowned for its ability to diffuse through materials quickly. Why is it, then, that we find an abundance of helium in certain rock crystals—that it has not managed to escape from them? This has significant implications for the dating of rocks using radioactive decay. That’s because helium is formed when some radioisotopes decay, and therefore lots of helium suggests lots of decay has occurred. Moreover, if lots of decay has occurred, it also suggests that the rock is very old. However, Nuclear Physicist Dr Russell Humphreys realised that lots of helium trapped in the rock crystals that had not had time to diffuse out means that the rocks were actually young. Dr Humphreys concluded that nuclear decay rates must have been dramatically faster in the recent past, and that is why rocks that are actually only thousands of years old are commonly wrongly dated using radioisotope decay as millions or billions of years old.

Radiometric dates are overturned when evolution theory disagrees with them. (So they are not the 'absolute' dating methods they are supposed to be.)