Radio-carbon dating

Content

All selected
Carbon dating—who is fooling whom?

Carbon dating—who is fooling whom?

Separating facts from fiction and data from the dogma regarding claims of accuracy for 14C and dendrochronology dating techniques.
Article
07 Nov, 2024
Equivocal carbon dating of ancient footprints

Equivocal carbon dating of ancient footprints

Equivocal carbon dating of ancient footprints in New Mexico, conflict with long-age understanding of human occupation of North America.
Article
03 May, 2024
Radiocarbon in dinosaur bones

Radiocarbon in dinosaur bones

Researchers recently presented at a geophysics conference in Singapore radiocarbon dating results of dinosaur bones ranging from 22,000 to 39,000 years old, which have since been censored.
Article
16 Dec, 2023
Ancient Apocalypse ‘hooey’

Ancient Apocalypse ‘hooey’

Graham Hancock’s popular Netflix TV series, Ancient Apocalypse, challenges the evolutionary status quo, proposing civilization is older than claimed, however, his ideas are not friendly to biblical history either.
Article
21 Jan, 2023
Radiometric dating breakthroughs

Radiometric dating breakthroughs

Radiometric dating breakthroughs
Article
26 Oct, 2022
William Pengelly’s Brixham cave excavations, and belief in the antiquity of man

William Pengelly’s Brixham cave excavations, and belief in the antiquity of man

William Pengelly’s 19th century cave excavations in Brixham, southwest England, encouraged support of the erroneous belief in the antiquity of mankind beyond the biblical timeframe.
Article
19 May, 2022
Do claimed dates for Göbekli Tepe and the Lost City of Dwarka outdate the
Bible’s timeline?

Do claimed dates for Göbekli Tepe and the Lost City of Dwarka outdate the Bible’s timeline?

Claimed dates for the Neolithic site Göbekli Tepe predate the Bible’s date of creation, and the Lost City of Dwarka supposedly predates the Flood—how should creationists respond?
Article
23 Dec, 2021
How old are the pyramids of Egypt?

How old are the pyramids of Egypt?

The oldest of Egypts pyramids fit comfortably within biblical history and timescale as post-Flood and post-Babel monuments.
Article
17 Feb, 2021
Carbon 14—still drawing a blank

Carbon 14—still drawing a blank

A CMI supporter writes in with a comment about the assumptions made behind the method of carbon 14 dating.
Article
26 Sep, 2020
Radioactive dating methods

Radioactive dating methods

Ways they make conflicting results tell the same story
Article
19 Aug, 2020
How old? When Archaeology conflicts with the Bible.

How old? When Archaeology conflicts with the Bible.

Archaeologists discover a spear point “9000 years old”? But it’s far older than either the biblical date for the Flood or Creation. What are the answers?
Article
01 Nov, 2018
Radioactive ‘dating’ in conflict!

Radioactive ‘dating’ in conflict!

Tree trunks engulfed by molten lava couldn’t survive could they? Here’s evidence that they did!
Article
03 May, 2017
Carbon-14 in diamonds: Refuting Talk.Origins

Carbon-14 in diamonds: Refuting Talk.Origins

Carbon-14 in Diamonds is still a problem for evolutionists.
Article
12 Nov, 2016
Dinosaur proteins and radiocarbon wreak ‘Jurassic World’ havoc

Dinosaur proteins and radiocarbon wreak ‘Jurassic World’ havoc

Collaborative creation research falsifies the evolutionary dates for the alleged ‘age of dinosaurs’.
Article
25 Jun, 2015
C-14 dates and the HK ‘ark’ claim

C-14 dates and the HK ‘ark’ claim

Discrepant C-14 dates provide further skepticism of the recent claims to have found Noah’s Ark on Mt Ararat.
Article
23 Oct, 2011
Dating of “oldest pottery” from China is based on assumptions

Dating of “oldest pottery” from China is based on assumptions

Dating of
Article
11 Jun, 2009