Radiometric dating

Russ Humphreys demolishes criticism of creationist RATE research project Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth

Billions of years of radioactive decay should have produced more helium in our atmosphere; while helium should have escaped zircons.

Argon diffusion data from the site where the RATE project gathered its helium diffusion data confirms the earth is young

All radioactive dates are based on assumptions so you can get any age you like by changing your assumptions.

Conflict over the date of the Mungo Man fossil shows that evolutionists do not automaticcaly accept laboratory dates, but interpret them within an evolutionary framework.

When radioisotope dating is applied to rocks of known age, such as the Mt St Helens lava dome formed in the 1980s, it fails miserably.

Halite salt radiometrically dated at 830-million-years-old contains saline inclusions containing prokaryote and eukaryote cells

Emil Silvestru interview

Answering questions about the radioactive dating of the Mount St Helens lava dome that exposes the problems with dating methods

Paleomagnetism measured in archaeological material from 586/587 BC Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem offers method of calibrating carbon-14 dating

Radiometric and genetic-clock dating, geo-structures, and geochemistry indicate Bicellum brasieri buried by Noah’s Flood and not one billion years ago.

If radiometric dating is objective science then why do researchers disagree so widely over the results?

Conflicting radioactive dating results are reported all the time and, on their own, there is no way of knowing what they mean.

How old is the earth?

Wood in old rocks yield recent age

Scientific