Dating problems

Long ages aren’t needed.

A living tree found in Australia matches leaf and pollen fossils supposedly millions of years old. Could the tree have survived that long?

Evolutionists reject radiometric dates when they conflict with evolutionary fossil dates, such as KBS Tuff pigs and skull 1470.

Russ Humphreys demolishes criticism of creationist RATE research project Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth

Argon diffusion data from the site where the RATE project gathered its helium diffusion data confirms the earth is young

There are numerous unknowns and inaccuracies in uniformitarian attempts to use microfossils to gauge past climates.

All radioactive dates are based on assumptions so you can get any age you like by changing your assumptions.

Does amino acid racemization make for a reliable dating technique?

DNA has been detected in a duckbilled dinosaur fossil, undermining the traditional millions of years age for it.

Do amino acids racemize in water faster than peptides can grow?

Biblical creation makes better sense than evolution of bird tracks found below bird fossils in the rock record.

An answer to Reasonable Faith Adelaide about lead in zircon crystals, the Concordia technique, and worldview bias of secular scientists.

The continents cannot be billions of years old because they would have eroded away long ago; there should be nothing left.

What assumptions and challenges call into question long-age attempts to assess the height of the land in the past?

Researchers recently presented at a geophysics conference in Singapore radiocarbon dating results of dinosaur bones ranging from 22,000 to 39,000 years old, which have since been censored.

Stone circles are difficult to date.