Geology

Massive coastal sand dunes were most likely formed both before the post Flood Ice Age, and immediately after the post Flood Ice Age.

The world’s largest sand island, K’gari (formerly known as Fraser Island), is said to be 700,000 – 1.2 million years old. But is it really? Do the processes from which these ages are derived really take that long? Or is there actually evidence that K’gari is young? Geomorphologist, Dr Ron Neller, is adamant that there is no need to assign such an old age to K’gari. Rather, he sees a pattern of evidence on the island that points to a 2-stage development that matches up very well with conditions that, firstly, followed the biblical Flood, and then secondly, followed the post-Flood Ice Age—only a few thousand years ago. Join us and decide for yourself—which historical narrative best fits the evidence?

Fresh wood and detectable carbon-14 in diamonds challenge claims of deep time, pointing instead to a much younger age consistent with the biblical timeline.

Folded rocks may look old, but evidence suggests they formed fast during the Flood—supporting the Bible over deep time.

When did the basement Archean Belts form? Was it during Creation Week or Noah’s Flood?

Can a Mammophant revive a lost landscape? Delve into the bold experiment of Pleistocene Park and its controversial plan to rewild Siberia with a hybrid creature.

Water has some fascinating features that suggest it has been designed ‘just right’ for life.

What happened to the woolly mammoths? Were they hunted, did they die from illness, or die from climate change?

Do thick ice sheets really take thousands of years to form?

This is powerfully consistent with the global tectonic catastrophe of Noah’s Flood

Long ages aren’t needed.

Under the right conditions, the process occurs in just months.

Implicit evidence for catastrophic deposition and short time frame.

Spectacular evidence for a young solar system

If you’ve heard of ice core dating, chances are you imagine some sort of precise, scientific dating method involving counting layers in ice samples—kind of like counting tree rings in trees. And you’d be partly right. But is ice core dating reliable? How does it work, anyway? Is it an objective dating method, or does it rely on assumptions? If assumptions are involved, does everybody agree on those assumptions? And how does ice core dating relate to the Bible’s account of history? Join geologist, Dr Tas Walker, for a fascinating exploration of ice core dating and its relation to origins, worldview, and even the meaning of life!

Archeological evidence for Noah’s ark so far has not been found conclusively. Maybe people are looking at the wrong mountain?