Genetics

A full-length stretch of DNA from a Neandertal mitochondrion has been sequenced. Some are using it to allege that it came from a different species to modern humans. But is that deduction justified?

This amazing species of amphibian has been described as ‘primitive’ and ‘an indicator of how evolution works’. But as always, it makes more sense in the light of the Bible.

How plausible is the evolutionists’ claim that gene duplication provides the raw material for evolution?

Twins with different skin tones disprove evolutionary ideas of ‘race’ and support the Bible’s record of human history.

The epigenetic code on DNA is the handiwork of a supremely intelligent programmer.

Scientific American claims that some nematodes have evolved in the lab, but the changes observed do not support microbes-to-man evolution at all.

Does gene duplication provide the engine for evolution?

Richard Dawkins, asked for an example of a mutation that can be seen to add information to the genome, failed to answer. A defender claims the question was not legitimate.

Meta-information — An impossible conundrum for evolution

Another evolutionary ‘truth’ now conceded to be myth. Evolutionists abandon the idea of 99% DNA similarity between humans and chimps.

Astonishing DNA complexity uncovered

Stanley Miller’s famous 1953 experiments are anything but evidence for evolution.

The complexity of the human genome indicates design, not evolution.

The critic fails to address the issues, using bluff and bluster. The data are consistent with there being one mother of all humans and within the Bible’s time frame.

The widely-touted 98-99% chimp/human DNA similarities are claimed as evidence for evolution. But as geneticists probe more deeply, things look very different.

Mutations are supposedly the raw material for evolution. Most are harmful or neutral. But even mutations that result in new functions are really informationally downhill, because they cause loss of specificity.