Genome

Atheists mock the Bible as unscientific, but in Genesis 30–31 God supernaturally superintends Jacob’s sheep breeding program

Genetic and morphological analyses suggest that there are four bat created kinds (baramins).

Did Venter make a truly synthetic new life form? What does it prove about chemical evolution or abiogenesis?

human, chimp, DNA, comparisons, 1 percent, myth Human and chimp DNA differ by far more the than 1% that has become unquestioned dogma

The functional proportion of the genome is higher than evolutionists want, but much of the genomic sequence is unaffected by natural selection.

Naturally caffeine-free tea is another example of loss, not gain, of genetic information

Doppelganger genes, which have highly similar functions and structures but are found in distantly related creatures, defy evolution.

Evolution cannot plausibly explain the existence of a minimally functional ensemble of tRNAs needed by the genetic system.

tRNAs and their fragments are important for many cellular processes, and precisely regulate many interactions in the cell.

Cells possess sophisticated quality control mechanisms to identity and eliminate transfer RNAs that are improperly formed.

Modern science allows us to perform experiments on human embryos that are contrary to Scripture. What should our response be?

tRNAs need dozens of complex and specific biochemical modifications to function properly.

tRNAs are linker molecules to translate mRNA into protein, but defy evolution in how they are formed.

The hemizygosity hypothesis may explain how cryptic genetic information contained with created kinds enables them to diversify.

In the creation model, God made species so that they could change over time, but change does not equal evolution.

Paul Price, Dr Robert Carter and Dr John Sanford respond to evolutionist scientists regarding Genetic Entropy.