Genetics

Almost all the current species have expanded from mitochondrial uniformity within the past 200,000 years.

Fossils and population genetics show that the popular ape-to-human evolution idea is a myth.

Ideonella sakaiensis has enzyme to eat PET plastic by design not evolution

The best and worst of humanity can be found in all races because ethnicity an morality are unrelated.

Because autopoiesis is reversible, it shows a design principle that is a logical consequence of how life must be made from the beginning—otherwise it doesn’t work.

Melanin and skin colour.

How Navajo language helped win World War 2, and provided a subtle lesson against evolution.

The skin colour genes of humans does not demonstrate evolution, instead we clearly came out of Babel.

Understanding the presuppositions and goals of the researchers to properly read the secular literature carefully, especially with chemical evolution (abiogenesis)

Evolutionists cite patterns of similarity and observed biological change as the main evidences, but both have major problems.

Are all creatures designed to adapt or the product of random mutations?

Many people think DNA is like a recipe or an ordered set of instructions. This is far too simplistic–because genomes operate in multiple dimensions. The first dimension is the sequence of DNA letters. Unlike a book, these DNA letters can be 'read' in different ways. For example, each part of a 'gene' can be used in constructing multiple different proteins, a process controlled by other parts of the genome—the second dimension. Then we must consider the arrangement of the DNA in the nucleus, where genes are not randomly distributed, but cluster together according to need—the third dimension. Even more impressively, the chromosomes in the nucleus vary in shape according to the cell’s changing needs over time—the fourth dimension. How could genomes operating in multiple dimensions have evolved? A rare beneficial mutation that might enhance things in one dimension would likely cause problems at other levels. Genomes look more and more like the handiwork of a supremely intelligent programmer.

Gregor Mendel (father of genetics) and Charles Darwin (father of modern evolution) disagreed. Darwin claimed creatures could change into unlimited other creatures. Mendel's discoveries suggest otherwise. See which idea science supports.

How does evolution explain reproduction?

How reliable are genomes built on ‘ancient’ DNA?

The human genome is a complex computer code that explains junk DNA and other evolutionary misunderstandings.