Philosophy

Evolutionists? own criteria for identifying a ?pseudoscience? show that evolution itself is a pseudoscience.

Good news Richard! Journal of Creation 22(2) is now available

Is Richard Dawkins an atheist? Or is he a God-hater?

More atheists on a mission: Dawkins’ fans object to review of The God Delusion

Many atheists barely even attempt a reasoned argument. The response shows that consistent Christianity provides the only logical basis for morality, charity, reason and science.

Dawkins and Eugenics: A leading high priest of evolution reveals its ugly side.

When a vocal defender of the Bible’s authority, even one who attacks evolution, is morally disgraced in the public eye, what does that say about the link between evolution and morality?

A Christian schoolgirl failed for refusing a ‘gay’ assignment gives cause to reflect on the ‘new tolerance’—and how it relates to what creation ministries are all about.

The origin of the first living organism is a huge problem for materialists. Agnostic DB of California agrees that creationist critiques are strong, but argues that ribozyme ‘evolution’ might solve the problem; Dr Sarfati responds.

Valedictorian speech censored by school.

Considering the number of variants of the ubiquitin protein, probability calculations show that it could not have arisen naturalistically.

What happens to our consciousness when the body dies? How did consciousness arise in the first place?

A Response to Richard Dawkins The Blind Watchmaker