Fossils

Whoops! What happens when scientists find fossils in the ‘wrong’ evolutionary sequence? This week, learn how the neat, ordered sequence of fossils required by evolution theory has serious problems, but fits wonderfully with the Bible. The facts reveal that the evolutionary timeline is wrong.

‘Living Fossils’ are characterized as creatures found in the fossil record (supposedly millions of years old) that are seemingly identical to creatures living today. This is a thorny issue for evolutionists since Darwin proposed his evolutionary hypothesis. The evidence of ‘massive change over time’ is dwindling rapidly. Meanwhile the evidence supporting creation is growing rapidly!

Atheists and theists promote evolution, contrary to both science and the Bible.

We hope you enjoy this sneak preview from the now-released December issue of Journal of Creation. Subscribers will be delighted by the powerful, stimulating content.

Sneak peek of latest Creation magazine. Pre-Cambrian fossils of marine worms have their original tissue. Similarly for bacteria that feed on them.

These uniquely designed creatures continue to defy evolutionary explanation …

Neandertals weren’t artistic—and yet they were.

Bill Nye’s claim that there are no out of order fossils puts a bullseye on a weak spot for evolution.

Whale evolution depends on Pakicetus, Ambulocetus and Rodhocetus, but claims about these being transitional to whales are false.

A fascinating look at the world’s largest living land animal …

An evolutionary paradox still not solved.

Evolutionist Mary Schweitzer trying desperately to explain dinosaur soft tissue by saying iron in blood preserved it 70+ million years.

Fossils provide remarkable support for the Bible's account of history, beginning with creation and including a global flood. This week we focus on some fossils that are very difficult to fit into the 'millions of years' timescale, but fit wonderfully with the Bible.

Reliable indicators of age in the rocks?

A sneak preview from the soon-to-be-released Creation magazine. For twenty years now, dino bones have progressively divulged their contents to researchers who did not expect to find the likes of DNA and radiocarbon ‘millions of years’ after dinosaur extinction.

How can something long known to be living, be dubbed a ‘living fossil’?