Creation compromise

Response to a correspondent who takes issue with Genesis as literal history.

Former cancer researcher explains why evolution is irrelevant to real science, and how evolution undermines the Gospel

Why it’s actually loving to critique and refute false ideas.

People think that

A reason to doubt God created in a literal week?

Creation magazine editorial: A pastor and a geologist realize why the young earth and global flood are foundational to the authority of Scripture, the goodness of God, and the Gospel

New ‘Christian’ textbook promotes theistic evolution

Francis Bacon believed Scripture, but his two books Scripture-science approach eventually undermined Scripture, but Scripture grounds science.

Orthodox on God, ambivalent on biblical literalism, bypassing science, and socially conservative.

Various old-earth positions have loads of trouble figuring out why God put animals on the ark!

One objection to a global Flood is the thought that the wind that blew across the earth would be insufficient to dry the land. This is nonsense.

Is the Bible so clearly an old-earth book that a young-earth reading is absurd?

A history of opposition to a literal understanding of Genesis

A Civic Biology was the centerpiece of the 1925 Scopes Monkey Trial. It is high time to review what was in that textbook.

The 1925 Scopes Monkey Trial pitted evolution and creation against each other in the courtroom.

John Walton’s claim that Genesis 1 is exclusively about functional creation is considered and critiqued.