Podcasts

Why focus on the origins debate if it is not a salvation issue? How does a believer's view about Genesis and creation affect their view of salvation?

The Apollo moon landings: triumph of operational science founded by creationists, especially Kepler and Newton. Conspiracy theories deny well known science.

This episode tackles what is one of the biggest stumbling blocks to understanding the debate about origins: the difference between operational and historical science.

The progressive creationists’ claim that the seventh day of creation is still continuing is without any exegetical foundation whatsoever, making it a worthless argument for non-literal creation days.

Wow, there really is evidence that dinosaurs lived after the flood, but the flood was less than 5000 years ago.

How can we see stars over 6,000 light years away if the earth is about 6,000 years old? But the big bangers have their own distant starlight problem, and creationists have multiple working hypotheses.

Are there any facts that are so powerful that anyone who hears them would believe creation? Powerful evidences for Biblical creation this week on Creation Magazine LIVE!

The belated push to preserve the wild varieties of our food plants highlights the fact that no amount of selection—artificial, by breeders, or natural—can generate information which is not there.

Biblical authority has been called the ‘issue of issues’ for Christians. This episode summarizes historical milestones that have led away from biblical authority.

Planets around other stars? Are they real and how do we know? Is there life on them? With all those planets and such a huge universe, why should God care so much about Earth?

Many scientists say that the evidence from genetics incontrovertibly shows humans did not originate from a single pair. This episode looks at specific arguments by bible skeptics and shows how wrong they are.

If humans did not come from apes, then what are we to make of Lucy, Neanderthals, and Homo erectus?

All Scripture is God-breathed, yet it was written by men. So, can we really trust it as completely accurate, or were factual errors included by the Bible's human authors?

Could life have arisen from non-living chemicals via chemical evolution? If life couldn’t start by itself, then Darwinian evolution could not have started, therefore it is a fiction.

Has the law of biogenesis (life begets life) been broken? Evolution says yes. However, when established scientific laws that describe the natural world are broken we recognize that as supernatural, or miraculous. So then, does the origin of life require the supernatural?

Gary Bates and Robert Carter discuss an idea that is popular in some creationist circles: programmed filling. While the idea does have merits, it is limited in its scope, especially after the entry of death into the world. Programmed filling is also associated with a rejection of natural selection in general, to which CMI does not agree.