Videos

Many creationists once proposed that the source of Flood waters was a water vapour canopy surrounding the earth above the atmosphere. But most modern creationists reject the model. A vapour canopy is not a direct teaching of Scripture, seems to contradict Scripture, and it would not have done what it was claimed to do.

Long ago many people determined truth by going to God's Word with the understanding that it was the highest source of truth. Today many people turn to a combination of science, human reason, or their own experiences to understand reality, considering those to be a higher source of truth than Scripture. This short clip summarizes the major stages in the fall away from biblical authority. Watch the entire episode at: https://creation.com/cml7-22 [https://creation.com/cml7-22]

Yes, the Bible was written by men, but it is error-free because God is the ultimate author. For more details watch the full episode at: https://creation.com/cml7-21 [https://creation.com/cml7-21]

Terms like 'micro-evolution' and 'macro-evolution' may suggest that the small changes that scientists (including creationists) observe, if given millions of years, will lead to big changes like evolving a single cell into a horse, or human. The main issue is not the amount of change but the direction of change. Genetic mutations deteriorate the genetic code. For more details, including how living things can adapt to changing environments, including antibiotic resistance, all while experiencing a degrading of the genetic code, watch the full episode at: https://creation.com/cml7-19 [https://creation.com/cml7-19]

How did all the animals fit on Noah’s Ark? How many animals were on board the Ark, and how did Noah take care of all of them? What did carnivorous animals eat on the Ark and after the Flood?

Did God perfectly (inerrantly) communicate his message but the human writer introduced errors? What are the implications of this position on the 'inerrancy' of Scripture? For more details watch the full episode at: https://creation.com/cml7-21 [https://creation.com/cml7-21]

Often 'supergerms', those that are resistant to powerful antibiotics, are 'superwimps'. And none of this supports evolution. For more details watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/myXaAU_JnqU [https://youtu.be/myXaAU_JnqU]

Creationists are often accused of arguing from ignorance when they insist God is responsible for the apparent design in nature. The design argument makes a case that certain features of nature are best explained by an intelligent cause. But a common criticism is that this arbitrarily inserts God as a placeholder to fill a gap in our knowledge, a gap which science will eventually explain, leaving God without any role. However, this is a caricature of the way design proponents really argue. Creationists infer divine design for sound reasons, not based on a lack of knowledge. In fact, atheists are often the ones who blindly assume the gaps will be filled with naturalistic explanations, regardless of the evidence, as this episode points out.

Yes, living things change genetically and become adapted to their environment. That type of change supports creation, not evolution. For more details watch the full episode at: https://www.creation.com/cml7-19 [https://www.creation.com/cml7-19]

Each of the 66 books that compose the Bible has 2 authors. Understanding 'dual authorship' is key to developing a high view of Scripture and understanding how a book physically written by humans can be error-free. A high view of Scripture enables us to accurately address the creation/evolution issue.

Antibiotic resistance is often used as evidence for 'molecules-to-man' evolution. While it is a great example of natural selection and adaptation, this kind of change is the wrong change needed to evolve a single cell to a horse, or human. Watch the entire episode at: https://creation.com/cml7-19 [https://creation.com/cml7-19]

The question of what happened to Adam when he ate the ‘forbidden fruit’ has been debated for centuries. Was Adam’s death physical or only spiritual? Was it instantaneous or delayed? God promised that Adam would die if he disobeyed, but the Bible also says Adam lived for hundreds of years afterward. Which is right? The answer requires an understanding of the underlying Hebrew wording and a comparison of how those phrases are used elsewhere. Yet, answering this perplexing question also has very important ramifications for New Testament theology. The promise was that physical death would follow disobedience. This is why Jesus had to physically die to pay for sins.

The Bible records not only that Jesus claimed to be God, but also that the Jews were ready to kill him for saying he was equal with God the Father.

According to the popular ‘gap theory’, the Genesis creation account can accommodate a history of millions of years in between the first two verses. But this attempt to squeeze millions of years into the Bible suffers from fatal flaws. The gap theory is inconsistent with its proponents’ own interpretation of Ezekiel 28. There are further problems with the gap theory as well, including its ad hoc suppositions, its placement of death before the Fall, its downplaying of Noah’s Flood, its violation of the Hebrew grammar in Genesis 1, and its opposition to Jesus’ view of Genesis. The Bible is clear—there is no gap!

If evolution is merely, "change in allele frequency over time", then creationists would be evolutionists. Living things change genetically over time and adapt to changing climates, but these changes are insufficient to evolve a single cell into a horse or human.

Some mind-bending truths about Jesus: the Bible describes Him as both fully God and fully man at the same time. Watch the entire episode at: https://creation.com/cml7-18 [https://creation.com/cml7-18]