Space

Big bang theory only appears to be scientific because people are exposed only to the evidence that appears to support it.

Creationists should now avoid using this argument.

How did Phobos and Deimos come to be so close to the red planet?

Is the physical data enough to justify any cosmological theory?

Everything we see is mostly made up of empty space

In theory, we shouldn’t be here.

Can naturalistic theories explain their origin and properties?

It’s an ‘out there’ concept that doesn’t help to explain why we are down here.

The results of a computer analysis to investigate how the solar system might have formed should cause evolutionists to think again about naturalistic processes.

Observations of the moons phases contradict flat-earth predictions and confirm spherical-earth predictions.

In wrestling with the overwhelming evidence of design around us, atheists propose explanations somewhere beyond this world; even in imagined other universes.

The big bang is the atheistic alternative to God as Creator, but it is both scientifically and theologically invalid.

The evolutionary timeline has a problem: Saturn’s icy rings are too ‘pristine’.

On Christmas Eve, December 24, 1968, the crew of Apollo 8 read from the Genesis account of creation.

When it comes to explaining how our universe came into being, widespread speculation is embraced over hard evidence.

It’s controversial to question the scientific basis of big bang, origin of life and evolution, but scientists acknowledge that these so-called facts are propped up by imaginative stories.