Space

The naturalistic model to explain how stars formed shows fatal flaws when compared with the known laws of physics.

The earth is a ‘privileged planet’ and was specially created to support life.

The big bang hypothesis demands that there should be stars with zero metal content.

The discovery of gravitational waves that match Einstein’s general relativity theory for a binary black hole merger is an example of solid operational science.

How can our souls influence the physical realm without violating the conservation of energy?

The distribution of the galaxies appears anything but random and stands in stark contrast to the model promoted by big bang cosmologists.

Could an anomaly found in the map of the cosmic microwave background be from one universe bumping up against another?

As scientists digest information from Pluto, it’s obvious the planet is young and defies long-age expectations.

Along with fudge factors, such as Dark Matter used to explain the big bang, the chameleon particle has been introduced even though there’s no evidence it exists.

Progressive creationist Hugh Ross has declared as fact something about the alleged big bang that even evolutionists want to be true but have not claimed.

Despite claims that stars formed from primordial clouds of gas, the known laws of physics show that to be impossible.

Scientific evidence life on earth came from outer-space?

Despite no verifiable evidence in support of dark matter, its existence is being presented to the public as established fact.

Not content with everything creating itself from nothing, the latest development in big bang theory even does away with a beginning.

First dark matter, then dark energy; now another mysterious entity is invented to explain a conflict between theory and observation.

The Standard Model of particle physics is on a collision course with the Big Bang model.