Origin of Life

Have chemical evolutionists proven that life could have evolved from non-living chemicals in hydrothermal vents?

National Geographic’s ideas about the origin of life merely masquerade as science. Yet they say creationists are at war with science?!

Scientific and biblical illiteracy enables so-called ‘experts’ to confuse church leaders about God and creation.

Taking apart the argument that says consciousness, rather than being a product of the supernatural soul, emerges from the complex physical structure of our brains

How two philosophies both lead people away from God.

There’s more to reality than naturalism can fathom …

German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is best known for his "God is dead" pronouncement, but although he believed in evolution, he vehemently rejected the major principles of Darwinism.

We hope you enjoy this sneak preview from the now-released April issue of Journal of Creation. Subscribers will be delighted by the powerful, stimulating content.

A strategy of subterfuge and stealth? Or to attack Christianity with all guns blazing? The ‘moderates’ and the ‘new atheists’ struggle to unite against their common creationist enemy!

Many atheopaths are reeling from the demolition of their hero Dawkins by the new Müller cell discoveries in the eye.

Dawkins’ latest book The Greatest Show on Earth purports to provide the proof of evolution. A new discovery further vindicates our refutation, The Greatest Hoax on Earth?

The ‘seven dimensions’ of religion can be found in atheism.

Why do some atheists declare ‘hurt’ and ‘offence’? Perhaps to put Christians on the defense and to stop them from giving answers against what the world is teaching.

Daniel Dennett’s book Darwin’s Dangerous Idea reveals just how corrosive it is.

The Apostle of Atheism, Richard Dawkins, contributes much to the public myth of evolution as established fact, but this book offers nothing substantive to the defence of evolution.

As expected, this older book from Dawkins is a misotheistic tirade. Not only is it full of errors, it fails to show why his own atheistic faith solves the problems.