Logic and fallacies

Evolution is often claimed to explain something and its opposite, so it certainly should not be called science, rather an unfalsifiable ideology!

The New York Times released an opinion piece recently that perfectly illustrates how evolutionists cannot live consistently with their worldview.

People have concerns about the new 5G technology. Other mix in fear of the coronavirus to stir the pot of conspiracy theory. The answers are actually easy to find.

Is God forced to be loving by his nature?

In wrestling with the overwhelming evidence of design around us, atheists propose explanations somewhere beyond this world; even in imagined other universes.

Psychologist Dr Julia Shaw says our society is ‘post-fact’, and she’s fine with that!

The Bible is the supreme authority in all it teaches. All else, and particularly human conjecture, is subordinate to and corrected by the written Word of God.

Scientific and biblical illiteracy enables so-called ‘experts’ to confuse church leaders about God and creation.

It’s irrational to think there is such a thing as ‘free energy’ in the universe.

Do we need to know how miracles happen to know if they happen?

What does history say?

As we look at the foundations of the ‘billions of years’ historical framework, are the foundations rock or sand?

A skeptic gives advice about how to debate creationists, but he unwittingly shows the religious nature of his position.

There’s more to reality than naturalism can fathom …

A simple parable cuts through the nonsense claims that, regardless of the evidence, it is ‘unscientific by definition’ to conclude in favour of divine creation as an explanation of origins.

A review of The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science by Peter Harrison