Creation Relevance

Biblical creationists founded modern science and continue to contribute substantially, contrary to hype from those with an anti-God agenda.

If naturalistic evolution is true, then a Creator God is redundant, as the horse and tractor analogy shows.

A naturalistic view of origins must explain the existence of coded information within living things arising from a ‘no mind’ process, but all of our scientific observations deny that possibility.

Second century Church Fathers believed God would end animal suffering and predation.

How did ancient Jewish rabbis understand creation in Genesis?

CMI answers the foundational existential questions of life such as "Where did we come from?", "Why are we here?" and "Where are we going?".

Global outrage over a hunter killing an African lion highlights the contradiction between care and concern for the treatment of animals and blind, pitiless evolution.

Contrary to the tired old mantra, ‘science has disproved the Bible’, biblical literate and scientifically informed Christians can (and should) proclaim creation with well-founded confidence.

Deep-time compromise has had a negative effect on the Christian church despite claims to the contrary.

Old-earth creationists should face the reality that their position more aligns them with a worldview that opposes Christianity.

Description Dynamic street evangelist Henry De Roos gives practical advice on how to use evidence about God’s creation to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Do compromising interpretations of Genesis help apologetics?

Did Adam and Eve need to eat before the Fall?

Is the troubled teenager who boasted about killing his teacher a product of evolutionary brainwashing?

Is it possible that Adam could not have comprehended death if he had not seen death?

What does history say?