Creation Relevance

Creation magazine editorial: A pastor and a geologist realize why the young earth and global flood are foundational to the authority of Scripture, the goodness of God, and the Gospel

Ignoring the challenge of biblical creation may seem a sound decision if you think it is not scientific. But is it? Would you risk eternity on it?

Scientific American accuses creationists of white supremacy, glossing over evolution’s own disgusting racist past.

Scientism is bunk. But how do we integrate Scripture and science?

Statements from evolutionists reveal their real motives.

My Christian friends don’t think it is

How long God took to create reflects his power.

‘No death before sin’, say biblical creationists, as an argument against theistic evolution—but there is so much more to the argument than that.

Answering a question about the purpose of attack-defence structures like claws, and about vegetarian diets pre-Fall.

John B from the UK writes into CMI questioning the article Time fears the pyramids? How they fit into the true biblical history. Gavin Cox and Gary Bates respond.

New ‘Christian’ textbook promotes theistic evolution

Balls of cells discovered in ancient rocks pushes back complexity and multi-cellularity to supposedly one billion years ago. Such evidence fits early biblical history far better than evolution.

Some academics claim that mathematics could be racist, and that there is such a thing as ‘white math’.

Francis Bacon believed Scripture, but his two books Scripture-science approach eventually undermined Scripture, but Scripture grounds science.

Does Paul allude to the Fall in Romans 6?

A biased survey of the history of Genesis interpretation.