Bible

The public education system only endorses one view of origins. Would it be better if the scientific evidence for creation was also taught? Would it be more 'fair?

Some Christians believe in evolution. Does this mean they are not Christians? Scientists and theologians are interviewed to answer this question.

Skeptics accuse creationists of pushing 'bad science' and religious ideas. This episode examines evolution according to the evolutionists own criteria for what science is. The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program features cutting edge science that supports the Bible delivered in a non-technical, visually-rich, discussion-based format.

Grand Canyon is often used as evidence for gradualism and evolution, however, examining the canyon shows that catastrophe, rather than time, carved it. Join us as we explore the Canyon via river raft. The geology of Grand Canyon testifies to the massive catastrophe that caused its formation.

Calling someone a "flat-earthier" defiantly isn't a compliment but many people believe that, in the past, the church taught that the earth is flat.

The book of Romans says that the evidence of God's creation is 'clearly seen' by all and that people are 'without excuse' for their disbelief (Romans 1:20). If evidence for creation is that obvious, why then does it seem that public education and media almost always present evidence as pointing to an evolutionary conclusion?

There are many good Christian organizations in the world today doing vital work. Where does Creation Ministries fit into all this and why are they worthy of support? This week we examine the critical role CMI plays in evangelism and the church.

A consequence of evolutionary thinking is that ancient people were intellectually inferior to moderns. On the other hand, the bible records that people began with high intelligence and had great capabilities. This week we look at evidence for the biblical record.

Fossils provide remarkable support for the Bible's account of history, beginning with creation and including a global flood. This week we focus on some fossils that are very difficult to fit into the 'millions of years' timescale, but fit wonderfully with the Bible.

An old-earth fails to deal with the major point raised in a CMI article. In fact, he actually makes the point and ignores four fundamental problems.

Many Christians feel that Genesis is a side issue and that modern Christians should just focus on New Testament teachings. What would we know about origins if we only studied the New Testament?

Rather than accept what the Bible says about who wrote Genesis (Moses), nearly all liberal Bible colleges and seminaries (and sadly some which profess conservative evangelical doctrine) teach the 'documentary hypothesis' (also known as the 'JEDP hypothesis') instead. So what is this hypothesis and does it actually answer the question of "Who wrote Genesis?"?

What does the Bible tell us about Adam and Eve?

In 2004 New Scientist magazine published an open letter to the scientific community in which 33 leading scientists blasted the big bang. Their strongly-worded letter included statements like: "The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed... Without them, there would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers and the predictions of the big bang theory... But the big bang theory can't survive without these fudge factors... An open exchange of ideas is lacking in most mainstream conferences... [and] doubt and dissent are not tolerated."

Do you have answers in this critical area?

A new angle on why the Gap Theory holds no water—comparing Genesis 1 with Genesis 13.