A critic who fires off many rhetorical rockets at once is seriously misinformed

A reader claims that we were unfair in our assessment of another Christian’s research. We respond.

Doesn’t Genesis explain the “why” and ‘science’ the “how”?

Is God forced to be loving by his nature?

A touching testimony shows exactly why we do what we do.

Why CMI talks about theology as well as science.

Stem cell-like ancestors of sponges only make early life more complex, and the probability of evolution less likely.

If Jesus taught a historical Genesis, so should we.

A skeptic says that creation is fictional because we haven’t proved that God exists. Is he right?

Is there such a thing as “the best scientific evidence for creation or a young earth”? Soft tissue in dino bones, carbon-14 in diamonds, big bang problems.

An old, discredited interpretation?

How can someone be “fearfully and wonderfully made” if they have disabilities like Down Syndrome?

How would you answer these objections to the most central event to our faith?

Does lengthening the ‘timeframe’ of the Cambrian explosion make it easier for evolutionists to explain?

No, its evidence for Creation!

Where do the lowest rocks in the rock record fit in the biblical timeframe?