Environmentalism

The biblical and scientific evidence show that human-generated CO2 will produce some warming, but there is no climate emergency.

The fight back from extinction of the Chatham Island black robin supports Noahs Flood.

Continuing from last week: more failed climate predictions, the root of the claim that “97 % of scientists” agree that climate change is man-made.

Large discrepancies between climate models and measured temperature data are examined. The underlying assumptions and worldviews behind different approaches to climate change are summarized.

Most oil comes from buried life; evidence indicates that some oil comes about in a completely different way.

Alan Titchmarsh, British TV personality, has recently defended the traditional well-managed garden against rewilding campaigns because it better supports wildlife. This supports the biblical stewardship mandate.

Misinterpretation of ice core data by Uniformitarian scientists could be fueling some of the current global warming alarm.

A response to the environmentalists’ rewilding agenda, which would devalue people and diminish the quality of human life. Far better, the biblical approach involves stewardship, and respect for creation.

Whose fault is climate change? Corporations? Capitalists? Or is the whole issue more about politics and fearmongering?

Yes, climate is changing, but theres no need to panic.

Can creation-based conservation provide a better solutions than evolution-based attempts?

A biblical approach to climate change (part 1)

A biblical approach to climate change (part 2)

As evolutionists ponder the propensity of chimps to kill other chimps, they are not rushing to the conclusion that this explains why humans kill humans.

In a speech on Climate Change the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson undermined a basic Christian doctrine relating to the status, duties and rights of mankind.