Dating

The world’s largest sand island, K’gari (formerly known as Fraser Island), is said to be 700,000 – 1.2 million years old. But is it really? Do the processes from which these ages are derived really take that long? Or is there actually evidence that K’gari is young? Geomorphologist, Dr Ron Neller, is adamant that there is no need to assign such an old age to K’gari. Rather, he sees a pattern of evidence on the island that points to a 2-stage development that matches up very well with conditions that, firstly, followed the biblical Flood, and then secondly, followed the post-Flood Ice Age—only a few thousand years ago. Join us and decide for yourself—which historical narrative best fits the evidence?

Body parts seen for the first time defy ‘slow burial’ ideas.

Long ages aren’t needed.

Cassini spacecraft’s shocking discovery overturns the age of Saturn’s rings.

A living tree found in Australia matches leaf and pollen fossils supposedly millions of years old. Could the tree have survived that long?

Evolutionists reject radiometric dates when they conflict with evolutionary fossil dates, such as KBS Tuff pigs and skull 1470.

Separating facts from fiction and data from the dogma regarding claims of accuracy for 14C and dendrochronology dating techniques.

How much nickel is there in the ocean?

Russ Humphreys demolishes criticism of creationist RATE research project Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth

Billions of years of radioactive decay should have produced more helium in our atmosphere; while helium should have escaped zircons.

Behemoth with a tail like a cedar was probably a sauropod such as Dreadnoughtus; Leviathan was a giant croc such as Sarcosuchus or Deinosuchus.

Studies show that teenagers who identify as Christian overwhelmingly doubt the truth of the Bible. What is the source of these doubts?

Argon diffusion data from the site where the RATE project gathered its helium diffusion data confirms the earth is young

There is an often-repeated assertion that evolution is scientific fact, while the Bible’s account of creation is mere religious stories or myths. However, it might be surprising to learn that there is some ‘storytelling’ included in the paradigm of evolution. You see, scientists from the evolutionary and creation paradigm both start from a particular worldview. And the worldview drives their interpretation of the facts. An evolutionary bias results in a natural focus on their presumption which leads to interpretations that ignore scientific evidence that supports biblical creation. In this discussion you will learn how the very nature of real science gives us a better understanding of why scientists come to very opposing conclusions. You’ll also get a taste of some simple scientific facts that stand in complete opposition to that idea that evolution is a scientific fact. You see, believing the Bible is not a ‘blind faith’.

Did dinosaurs generally take good care of the eggs and hatchlings: the Maiasaura or ‘good mother’ lizard.

The Bible gives clear historical markers to allow us to construct a chronology for the age of the earth.