Flaws in dating the earth as ancientWhen the numbers don’t add up, it’s time to examine the methods and the philosophy behind them.Article20 Sep, 2017
Carbon-14 in diamonds: Refuting Talk.OriginsCarbon-14 in Diamonds is still a problem for evolutionists.Article12 Nov, 2016
Radiometric backflipThe discovery of bird tracks in ‘Late Triassic’ rocks once again puts a big question mark over the veracity of long-age radiometric techniquesArticle18 Apr, 2016
Oxidizable carbon ratio datingWhat is it? And is it evidence against the Bible’s age of the earth?Article20 Jul, 2014
Radiometric dating and the age of the EarthThe 4.5 billion-year radiometric ‘age’ of the earth is based on faulty assumptions even secular researchers have acknowledged.Article08 Aug, 2012
Evidences for a young earth and universe‘Billions of years’ is accepted without question but there is lots of evidence that the earth and universe are much, much younger.Article28 May, 2012
The fatal flaw with radioactive dating methodsWhen you peel away the mystery it’s obvious that the dates are not objectively measured.Article30 Jul, 2009
Carbon-14 dating explained in everyday termsCarbon-14 dating—explained in everyday termsArticle27 Jan, 2006
Stumping old-age dogmaRadiocarbon in an ‘ancient’ fossil tree stump casts doubt on traditional rock/fossil datingArticle27 Jan, 2006
Dating dilemma: fossil wood in ‘ancient’ sandstoneDating dilemma: fossil wood in ‘ancient’ sandstoneArticle26 Jan, 2006
Countering the critics (Radio-dating in Rubble)Criticisms of Dr Steve Austins research on the Mt St Helens dacite lava dome are refuted.Article26 Jan, 2006