Big bang

Latest antimatter research undermines big bang theory

Big bang theory only appears to be scientific because people are exposed only to the evidence that appears to support it.

Creationists should now avoid using this argument.

In theory, we shouldn’t be here.

The big bang is the atheistic alternative to God as Creator, but it is both scientifically and theologically invalid.

When it comes to explaining how our universe came into being, widespread speculation is embraced over hard evidence.

It’s controversial to question the scientific basis of big bang, origin of life and evolution, but scientists acknowledge that these so-called facts are propped up by imaginative stories.

Scientists are searching for answers to questions which in theory they shouldn’t even have to ask, especially in regards to gravity.

By invoking a hypothetical to test the hypothetical big bang, two cosmologists develop a model out of nothing.

If Cosmic Microwave Background radiation came from the big bang, we should see shadows as it passes through galaxy clusters, but the predicted ‘shadows’ are not found.

Despite claims that stars formed from primordial clouds of gas, the known laws of physics show that to be impossible.

Not content with everything creating itself from nothing, the latest development in big bang theory even does away with a beginning.

First dark matter, then dark energy; now another mysterious entity is invented to explain a conflict between theory and observation.

Some big bang cosmologists end up with the conclusion they want to find simply by turning the evolution knob.

Astrophysicists in damage control after big-bang ‘find’ doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.

A research physics professor, Dr John Hartnett points out how Scripture’s version of events differs completely from the big bang/long-ages model and defends creationist claims of problems with ‘inflation’.