Bible

Is the debate about how we should understand Genesis just like disputes about end-times prophecy (eschatology)?

Darby and the Scofield Reference Bible advocated the Gap theory, which helped old-earth creationism grow among conservative evangelicals.

Soft gappers claim Gen. 1:1–2 refers to creation of stars, galaxies and the matter of the earth, and v. 3–31 to forming and filling of earth billions of years later.

The evidence shows overwhelmingly that Genesis is an authentic, literal historical record of what actually happened.

Hugh Ross makes excuses for ignoring Refuting Compromise, and claims that YECs have ignored A Matter of Days.

Jesus created food, gave life to the dead, and healed the sick by His word of command and the exercise of His will, not by any evolutionary process.

What is the doctrine of Original Sin, and what happens to babies who die? Do they go to heaven?

Conversational approaches to studying Scripture can lead to liberalism, where truth and values become relative.

How might ecosystem functioning have differed before the Fall?

Vegans using ChatGPT to re-write Scripture and an AI church preachers. Are there dangers as people are more inclined to rely on robots?

Compromising on Genesis has far reaching consequences, even for the cross.

Quibbles over semantics can be irritating, but knowing the true meaning of the words of Scripture is enlightening.

Many modern scholars believe that the Genesis genealogies contain gaps and cite fluidity as the reason. What is fluidity and why is it wrong?

Those who insist that Biblical creationists are being divisive over ‘small details’, need to reconsider what Jesus said about Genesis.

Genesis teaches us that marriage has been baked into human nature by God, who created us. Social science shows it is a good design, vital for human flourishing.

The language of Genesis shows that it’s history, and that’s how the rest of the Bible treats it.