Theory of evolution

It actually speaks against Darwinism!

One-sided discussion of theistic evolution.

Evolution is often claimed to explain something and its opposite, so it certainly should not be called science, rather an unfalsifiable ideology!

“From the horse’s mouth”—one has to smile when evolutionary scientists unintentionally provide strong confirmation of the views of those ‘pesky’ creationists!

A review of ‘40 Years of Evolution: Darwin’s finches on Daphne Major Island’ by Peter and Rosemary Grant.

When the peacock vibrates its colourful fan of tail feathers, the ‘eyespots’ behave differently from the rest of the feathery background, leaving the peahen mesmerized.

Hybridization occurs in the wild more than evolutionists thought. What does this mean for biblical creation?

Neo-Darwinism, Neutral evolution, and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis cannot avoid the multilayered complexity of the genome and cell.

There is more than one view among evolutionary researchers on how new biological structures arise.

Under the guise of protecting school pupils against indoctrination, hypocritical moves are afoot to propagate scientific materialism.

How two philosophies both lead people away from God.

Evolutionists try to define homology by how it is explained, not by how it is observed.

Some scientists connect changes in the grasses that animals ate and the development of teeth.

Many believers in nature’s capacity for evolutionary innovation think the sky’s the limit—yet their allegedly ‘naturalistic science’ writings betray a faith in the abilities of ‘Nature’ that borders on paganism.

Some evolutionists insist they observe evolution happening all around us while others say it happens too slowly to be able to observe. How can it be both?

How do evolutionists construct their scientific case for evolution? How can the creationist respond in scientific terms?