Theology

Many passages in Scripture require Adam to be historical. Among them is Romans 5:12–21, where a historical Adam is contrasted with the historical Jesus.

A Roman Catholic priest and Ph.D. physicist shows how biblical creation was the traditional view of the Church Fathers and medieval Church Doctors and makes sense of science.

When were the Gospels written? How long was this after the events they record? Should they be trusted if they were written decades later?

How far should Bible translators go to accommodate their proposed readers? Some important biblical principles are explained.s?

The chronology of the genealogy in Genesis 5 ties Creation week to the subsequent events, strongly authenticating the real history of Genesis 1?11

A number of respondents to a UK survey disagreed with a ?male God?. But what does the Bible teach, and what does it mean for people of both sexes?

A critic suggests that Genesis 1–11 was written in the genre of myth rather than as a literal historical account. How do we know it’s not myth?

The meaning of the term ‘Evenings and mornings’ in Genesis<div><br></div>

Are books quoted in the New Testament really authoritative?

Hermeneutics, the study of how we should interpret the Bible, is foundational to all theology. If we make the correct assumptions about the nature of the Bible, we can be confident at arriving at a proper understanding of what God is saying to us.

The Documentary Hypothesis claimed that the books of Moses were late concoctions, not written in the time of Moses. This book documents and debunks this false idea that (sadly) even affects the teaching of conservative theological colleges / seminaries.

Luke’s account of Christ’s birth shines like a beacon of credibility in this age of skepticism towards the historicity of the Bible.

The Sydney Anglicans are rightly respected for their stand on biblical authority. But a recent affiliated publication calls for seeing Genesis as ‘figurative’.