Space

Extrasolar planets are no challenge to biblical cosmology, but create problems for evolutionary explanations of solar system origins.

Multiple lines of evidence support the Bible

Creationists have more in their armoury now to deal with that question than ever before—while the problems for long-age evolutionists just get worse.

For thousands of years, secular astronomers thought that the stars had all been counted, although the Bible says they can’t be numbered. Modern astronomy supports the Bible.

Secular models for Ganymedes magnetic field struggle, but creationist models offer a better framework.

Evolutionists are looking for extrasolar planets like Earth to promote evolutionary

God created a great variety of stars—huge range of sizes and colours. Natural formation of first stars impossible, because gas expands rather than contracts

Triune God, not big bang, created universe in six 24-hour days about 6,000 Earth years ago, to be ideal home and observatory.

The race to find life beyond our planet.

God made huge universe, shown by parallax, needing light years to describe vast distances.

Many scientists reject the big bang hypothesis because of its manifest inconsistencies; however they are not commonly heard, because they are censored.

The distant starlight problem is sometimes used as an argument against biblical creation, but the big bang model also has a light-travel-time problem.

Axial tilt is a deliberate design feature, not a mere accidental happenstance.

There is increasing evidence of the remarkable stability of our solar system. Other star systems in the Milky Way appear much more chaotic.

The numerous computer gyrations are really showing that a naturalistic origin of the moon is extremely difficult, if not impossible.

Chaos theory might shape our understanding of biblical creation and call into question secular dating methods and evolutionary ideas.