Space

Magnetism on moon rocks supports its recent creation and means it is not billions of years old.

The Cassini spacecraft’s final passes over Saturn challenges the billion-year age for its rings.

Observations of the moons phases contradict flat-earth predictions and confirm spherical-earth predictions.

Messenger spacecraft measurements of Mercury’s decreasing magnetic field support creationist predictions

Most of us have been told—as scientific fact—that our solar system formed by itself from a swirling disc of dust and gas about 4.5 billion years ago. However, this story (about the distant, unobserved past) is actually just a hypothesis that rests on an array of unprovable assumptions. The most central of these is the belief that everything can (and must) be explained without reference to God. But is that assumption reasonable? How well does it fit with the observations? The truth is that the physical evidence we observe in our solar system contradicts the evolutionary story—on many counts. Join Dr Mark Harwood—who played a key role in the development of Australia’s national satellite system—for a fascinating and enlightening look at just some of the evidence that points to a young age for our solar system. Also, find out why any of this even matters!

Magnetic fields, volcanoes, and the moon’s movement hint at a younger solar system. Dr Mark Harwood explores evidence aligning with biblical creation.

Dr Mark Harwood explores evidence challenging the 4.5-billion-year age of the solar system, aligning with the Bible and questioning scientific assumptions.

Uranus: The strange planet

Energy budget calculations show that the proposed Hydroplate theory explanation for asteroids, comets, and trans-Neptunian objects does not work.

For a theory to be correct, its predictions must come true—its expectations must turn out to be accurate. (Note, though, that this, alone, isn't enough to prove a theory.) But when a theory repeatedly makes predictions that turn out to be wildly at odds with reality, it shows that the theory is completely wrong, and should be dropped immediately. Which of these two categories does evolutionary theory (in all its many forms—cosmological, geological, biological, etc.) fall in? What about biblical creation? The answers to these questions will come as a surprise to many! Join plant biologist, Dr Don Batten, for a look at just some of the ways in which evolutionary theory has predicted the exact opposite of what reality would eventually reveal—while biblical creationist predictions have been shown to be remarkably accurate!

Volcanic activity on Pluto shows neither it nor the entire solar system to be nearly as old as some astronomers believe.

Insights into our Solar Systems age and evolution - challenging long-age views with celestial phenomena

Evidence of hot magma on Mars suggests that it is young

Unveil the Divine Architect – Explore Gods cosmic design, from galaxies to planets, and discover His profound message within creation.

Astronomy: the cosmos, galaxies, stars, and planets reveal the omnipotence and omniscience of God whom Scripture reveals as the Saviour.

Earth is perfect for life. No other known planet, around the sun or any other star, is suitable. Life can’t evolve from non-living chemicals, and must be created.