Soft tissue

Does the evidence justify invoking this mechanism to preserve soft tissues for millions of years?

Did octopus fossil ink really survive millions of years?

Can biological pigment molecules really survive over a billion years?

A critic says morality has evolutionary roots, and blasts creationists for their “narrow” worldview.

Sneak peek of latest Creation magazine. Juvenile cats frozen in time give unique snapshot of the past.

Triceratops soft tissue found and carbon dated

Why don’t the media admit that Alaskan hadrosaur bones are not turned to stone, as would be expected in millions of years?

Sneak peek of latest Creation magazine. Pre-Cambrian fossils of marine worms have their original tissue. Similarly for bacteria that feed on them.

Evolutionist Mary Schweitzer trying desperately to explain dinosaur soft tissue by saying iron in blood preserved it 70+ million years.

A sneak preview from the soon-to-be-released Creation magazine. For twenty years now, dino bones have progressively divulged their contents to researchers who did not expect to find the likes of DNA and radiocarbon ‘millions of years’ after dinosaur extinction.

Dino bone has DNA in just the right positions to be from the dino. But measured rates of DNA decay in bones prohibit survival for 65 million years.

The best ever find of preserved soft tissue yet documented in the fossil record are powerful evidence for the Bible

Not just DNA, but even entire organisms capable of being brought back to life are increasingly being found in specimens supposedly ‘millions of years old’.

Mary Schweitzer announces even stronger evidence, this time from a duckbilled dino fossil, of even more proteins—and the same amazingly preserved flexible blood vessel and cell structures as before.

Were the reports of soft tissue in T. rex bones all wrong? Is it time to discard this powerful-seeming evidence? Not yet, it seems.

Do today’s definitions of the word ‘fossil’ rule out a biblical timescale by default?