Radio-carbon dating

Radiocarbon in an ‘ancient’ fossil tree stump casts doubt on traditional rock/fossil dating

Separating facts from fiction and data from the dogma regarding claims of accuracy for 14C and dendrochronology dating techniques.

Equivocal carbon dating of ancient footprints in New Mexico, conflict with long-age understanding of human occupation of North America.

Researchers recently presented at a geophysics conference in Singapore radiocarbon dating results of dinosaur bones ranging from 22,000 to 39,000 years old, which have since been censored.

Graham Hancock Ancient Apocalypse proposes civilization older than secular archaeology allows.

Radiometric dating breakthroughs

William Pengelly’s Brixham cave excavations encouraged belief in the antiquity of mankind beyond the biblical timeframe.

Göbekli Tepe and Lost City of Dwarka dates do not fit Genesis timeline for Creation or Flood.

The oldest of Egypts pyramids fit comfortably within biblical history and timescale as post-Flood and post-Babel monuments.

Carbon 14 procedural blanks are not carbon-14 ‘dead’ therefore entire method is suspect.

Conflicting radioactive dating results are reported all the time and, on their own, there is no way of knowing what they mean.

Archaeologists discover a spear point “9000 years old”? But it’s far older than either the biblical date for the Flood or Creation. What are the answers?

Fossil wood in ancient lava flow yields radiocarbon.

TalkOrigins fails to explain Carbon 14 in Diamonds

Carbon-14 testing of dinosaur fossils shows they cannot be millions of years old.

The discrepant C-14 dates provide further skepticism of the recent claim by a Hong Kong Team to have found Noahs Ark on Mt Ararat.