Quotes

Content

All selected
The passing of a monarch

The passing of a monarch

The death of Queen Elizabeth II is an opportunity for reflection, and gratitude to God, for her Christian life and service.
Article
15 Sep, 2022
The Attenborough eye-worm argument against God

The Attenborough eye-worm argument against God

The West African worm Loa loa, cause of the disease Loiasis, does not deserve its infamy.
Article
27 Mar, 2021
Evolution of mind?

Evolution of mind?

EVOLUTION OF MIND? WOLPERT ON EVOLUTIONARY ‘JUST SO’ STORIES The key evolutionary idea related to our minds is that of adaptiveness; that is those behaviours, thoughts and beliefs that help us humans to survive better. Genes can determine variants in such processes and evolution will select those individuals that survive best, and will so select those genes. The problem is to identify just what those characteristics are and how genes affect them, and to distinguish them from those that arise from interaction with the environment and learning. Alas, much of the evolutionary biology that I will use is similar to Kiplings Just So stories, like how the camel got its hump. It is very difficult to get reliable evidence to show whether one is right or wrong. One cannot go back in time, but I hope that this book, like Kiplings, is both interesting and entertaining. (Lewis Wolpert is a high profile evolutionary paleoanthropologist.) Lewis Wolpert, Six impossible things before breakfast: The evolutionary origins of belief, p. xi, Faber and Faber, London, 2007.
Article
21 Feb, 2017
Peer review is good for . . .?

Peer review is good for . . .?

PEER REVIEW IS GOOD FOR . . .? “If peer review is good at anything, it appears to be keeping unpopular ideas from being published.” William A. Wilson, Scientific Regress, First Things May 2016; “Americas most influential journal of religion and public life” www.firstthings.com/article/2016/05/scientific-regress
Article
04 Jan, 2017
Peter Dodson: feathered dino ‘dates’ undermine dino-to-bird evolution

Peter Dodson: feathered dino ‘dates’ undermine dino-to-bird evolution

Peter Dodson: feathered dino ‘dates’ undermine dino-to-bird evolution
Article
05 Oct, 2015
Evolution is historical science, in contrast with physics and chemistry (Mayr)

Evolution is historical science, in contrast with physics and chemistry (Mayr)

Leading evolutionist: evolution is a historical science, in contrast to observational science
Article
05 Feb, 2014
Darwinism a cult? (Peter Hitchens)

Darwinism a cult? (Peter Hitchens)

DARWINISM A CULT? (PETER HITCHENS) The following challenge to the British Broadcasting Corporation appeared on the Peter Hitchens feature page of the International Express (UK), on 5 January 2000: “DARWIN’S BIZARRE CULT The BBC teased religious leaders by asking them if they believed in the literal truth of the great Bible stories. I would like to ask BBC chiefs and the rest of our secular establishment if they believe in the literal truth of evolution. Evolution is an unproven theory. If what its fundamentalist supporters believe is true, fishes decided to grow lungs and legs and walk up the beach. The idea is so comically daft that only one thing explains its survival—that lonely, frightened people wanted to expel God from the Universe because they found the idea that He exists profoundly uncomfortable.” -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: British columnist Peter Hitchens is the brother of Christopher Hitchens, who was famous for his very public stance in opposing faith in God. Peter, like his brother, was once an atheist, but partially as a result of seeing the fruit of atheism in Soviet Russia, he is now a Christian.
Article
24 Jan, 2014
Birch & Ehrlich: Evolution “outside of empirical science”

Birch & Ehrlich: Evolution “outside of empirical science”

Quotable Quotes archive [/qa#quotable_quotes] BIRCH & EHRLICH: EVOLUTION “OUTSIDE OF EMPIRICAL SCIENCE” “Our theory of evolution has become, as Popper described, one which cannot be refuted by any possible observations. Every conceivable observation can be fitted into it. It is thus ‘outside of empirical science but not necessarily false’. No one can think of ways in which to test it.” REFERENCE Charles Birch and Paul Ehrlich, Evolutionary history and population biology, Nature 214:352, 1967. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: Darwinian explanations are too flexible to be useful (Skell) [/darwinian-explanations-are-too-flexible-to-be-useful]
Article
20 Jan, 2014
“I hope there is no God!”

“I hope there is no God!”

“I HOPE THERE IS NO GOD!” Thomas Nagel > “I speak from experience, being strongly subject to this fear myself: I want > atheism to be true and am made uneasy by the fact that some of the most > intelligent and well-informed people I know are religious believers. It isn’t > just that I don’t believe in God and, naturally, hope that I’m right in my > belief. It’s that I hope there is no God! I don’t want there to be a God; I > don’t want the universe to be like that. My guess is that this cosmic > authority problem is not a rare condition and that it is responsible for much > of the scientism and reductionism of our time. One of the tendencies it > supports is the ludicrous overuse of evolutionary biology to explain > everything about human life, including everything about the human mind …. This > is a somewhat ridiculous situation …. [I]t is just as irrational to be > influenced in one’s beliefs by the hope that God does not exist as by the hope > that God does exist.” 1 REFERENCE 1. Nagel, Thomas, The Last Word, pp. 130–131, Oxford University Press, 1997. Dr Nagel (1937– ) is Professor of Philosophy and Law at New York University. Return to text.
Article
03 Sep, 2013
Scientism versus science

Scientism versus science

SCIENTISM VERSUS SCIENCE “Scientism is not the same thing as science. Science is a blessing, but scientism is a curse. Science, I mean what practicing scientists actually do, is acutely and admirably aware of its limits, and humbly admits to the provisional character of its conclusions; but scientism is dogmatic, and peddles certainties. It is always at the ready with the solution to every problem, because it believes that the solution to every problem is a scientific one, and so it gives scientific answers to non-scientific questions. Owing to its preference for totalistic explanation, scientism transforms science into an ideology, which is of course a betrayal of the experimental and empirical spirit.” Leon Wieseltier, Perhaps Culture is Now the Counterculture: A Defense of the Humanities, 19 May 2013; www.newrepublic.com/article/113299/leon-wieseltier-commencement-speech-brandeis-university-2013 [Wieseltier self-describes as a humanist.] FURTHER READING The religion of scientism [/the-religion-of-scientism-m-shallis].
Article
06 Aug, 2013
Luther on creation days

Luther on creation days

Martin Luther clearly saw that believing the Bible about a literal 6 days of creation was a matter of the Bibles authority as the Word of God.
Article
04 Mar, 2013
Homochirality an unsolved problem

Homochirality an unsolved problem

A review of the origin of homochirality before life acknowledges that it remains an unsolved problem
Article
07 Feb, 2013
Crichton on scientific consensus

Crichton on scientific consensus

Article
06 Mar, 2012
Evolution definition Kerkut

Evolution definition Kerkut

Article
09 Feb, 2012
God of evolution diabolical

God of evolution diabolical

Article
03 Feb, 2012
Flat earth leader is an evolutionist

Flat earth leader is an evolutionist

Leader of the Flat Earth society is an evolutionist
Article
17 Nov, 2011