Presuppositions

Do we need to know how miracles happen to know if they happen?

A sneak preview of the editorial from the soon-to-be-released Creation magazine. Subscribers will be delighted with the magazine’s powerful content and brilliant graphics.

History’s most influential book has been widely abandoned as the world rejects its transformative power and embraces evolution.

Understanding the difference between what opposing theories predict helps to discriminate between them and thus avoid useless arguments.

Where they are not ignored, creationists are invariably disparaged and misrepresented.

Richard Dawkins says a rabbit fossil in the Precambrian would be evidence against evolution, but would that really be the case?

Old-earth creationists should face the reality that their position more aligns them with a worldview that opposes Christianity.

How to build a case for biblical creation

What does history say?

Far from the theory of evolution being derived from facts that speak for themselves, it is actually rooted in the philosophical concept of atheism.

It is difficult sometimes to get the appropriate balance of ‘grace and truth’ when responding to opponents. Here are some principles that CMI uses.

An old-earth fails to deal with the major point raised in a CMI article. In fact, he actually makes the point and ignores four fundamental problems.

What’s the difference?

How key terms in the origins debate have been defined to slant the ‘rules of engagement’ between Christianity and secularism against Christianity.

As we look at the foundations of the ‘billions of years’ historical framework, are the foundations rock or sand?

A skeptic gives advice about how to debate creationists, but he unwittingly shows the religious nature of his position.