Presuppositions

A reader asks for help responding to someone who says, “It was theology, not science, that turned me off to creation.”

What can the famed character Ian Malcolm from Jurassic Park teach us about forensic investigations and historical science?

Carl Wieland chats with Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton.

Responding to recent William Lane Craig statements about creation and the historical Adam and Eve.

How objective are scientists?

How God’s sovereign freedom undergirds the scientific enterprise.

Darwin’s real message—have you missed it? Some evolutionists really do understand its materialistic implications.

In wrestling with the overwhelming evidence of design around us, atheists propose explanations somewhere beyond this world; even in imagined other universes.

Psychologist Dr Julia Shaw says our society is ‘post-fact’, and she’s fine with that!

Is experimental science overrated?

Life looks like it was designed. Is that impression nothing more than like seeing bunnies in clouds?

Christians and atheists have presuppositions that affect how we interpret facts and evidence.

Evolution, it is claimed, removes the need for a designing intelligence of life on Earth, but this amounts to the logically absurd proposition of ‘Unintelligent Design’.

What should we be aware of as we try to read the secular literature with a careful and critical eye?

Why is evolutionary theory so full of deliberate frauds? And is this the major creationist argument against evolution?

The Lord Jesus told us that certain trees will produce certain fruit. Gary Bates uses this analogy to show the importance of Genesis creation for our worldviews.