Presuppositions

Science is limited in what it can tell us about God, the universe, and the nature of nothing.

An agnostic has doubts and shows internal blindness but it’s unsafe to be unsure, and creation apologetics helps answer agnosticism.

However trustworthy our minds are, naturalistic evolution has deep epistemic problems.

The systematic consistency of biblical creation: an introduction.

Irenaeus: the prophets and apostles regarded creation as foundational.

Absolute truth is real, but it probably is not the best way to argue for Gods existence.

History denial and skepticism of Genesis in favour of consensus science damages both science and Christianity, ethics and the Gospel.

A review of Science Without God? by Peter Harrison and Jon H. Roberts (Eds.)

Faith, evidence, facts, presuppositions, worldviews and proofs for creation.

Empirical science does not preclude metascientific convictions. Biblical creationists accused of circular reasoning actually hold fast to Scriptural truths.

We discern the truth in the origins debate most fundamentally by testing against the Bible.

Mathematics is not racist, but from God’s mind, shown by Fibonacci Sequence, Euler’s equations, Genesis chronogenealogies.

Scripture doesnt say if God could have entered into time; arguments for and against probe beyond Scripture.

A reader asks whether CMI has a blind allegiance to the Bible—requiring the automatic dismissal of contrary evidence.

Does the fingerprintless Sarker family (with no dermatoglyphs) demonstrate evolution in action or is it a harmful mutation?

A reader asks for help responding to someone who says, “It was theology, not science, that turned me off to creation.”