Philosophy

The difference between operational and historical science helps to answer questions about flat earth, biblical creation, and natural selection, while avoiding non-discriminating information.

Many people think that the biblical flood of Noah was abandoned because of the evidence. However, history tells a different story. Modern geological thought owes much to a man named Charles Lyell. Lyell, a lawyer, published a book in 1830 called Principles of Geology. Described as a "masterpiece of persuasion", it changed the way people thought about earth's past. According to Lyell, we should only appeal to today's geological processes to explain earth history. However, this approach meant that the global flood recorded in the Bible was automatically ruled out of consideration. Lyell wanted, he wrote, "to free the science [of geology] from Moses". Regrettably, many people have uncritically adopted Lyell's philosophy, without considering how Noah’s flood can help us understand earth history. Lyell changed the way many people think, but his approach was motivated by his anti-biblical philosophy, not an objective study of the evidence. Indeed, it is very difficult to explain earth's history without Noah's Flood.

Christians will quote Scripture as plainly written to justify belief in the events leading up to the crucifixion and the resurrection. However, in regarding the creation account, there is a much greater tendency to give authority to extra-biblical ideas rather than going strictly with the text. This episode uses Genesis chapters 1-11 as a case study for biblical authority.

Why materialism logically leads scientists to a confused state over the universe.

Naturalists declare genetic coding arose from a mindless process. But coded information has only been observed coming from a mind.

Agnosticism is uncertainty about God\\s existence. How should Christians respond?

Rabbit fossils in the Precambrian.

Does the Christian church see any conflict between long ages and biblical claims about origins?

History tells us that the majority of scientists can be wrong?

Snowmen, designed or created? Complex humans, designed or created? Specified complexity requires intelligent minds.

21 arguments for biological evolution are examined.

At a forum on depression a young man said, "I think some people may have an inability to cope and maybe, this might sound a bit extreme, that might be Darwinian theory, the Darwin theory of survival of the fittest. Maybe some of us aren't meant to survive, maybe some of us are meant to kill ourselves."

Evolutions origins are anti-Christian and anti-biblical, and its consequences appear to be uniformly evil.

Key terms such as natural law, miracle, and methodological naturalism have been modified or invented in ways that slant the rules of engagement between Christianity and secularism against Christianity.

Deep time history is founded on irrational axioms that ignore the power of testimony as evidence in history.

In 2003, the Nobel Prize for Medicine was awarded to the pioneers of MRI scanning technology. But of those honored for this amazing medical breakthrough, there was a glaring omission.