Naturalism

Evolution undercuts reason and science, since it says humans are mere matter and our minds were not designed.

Sociobiology fails to explain the origin of morality, and it rejects rather than explains moral objectivity.

Many of Chesterton’s arguments against evolution are still used today by creationists.

No evidence for UV circularly polarized light exists in nature to generate excess left-handed amino acids for abiogenesis.

Facebook’s boss is working towards a world in which our get-togethers are less likely to be ‘real’.

Animal studies fail to demonstrate that they have a proto-morality’ that could have evolved into the human moral impulse.

Reciprocal altruism and evolutionary game theory fail to explain how genuine moral altruism began.

Kin selection fails to provide an evolutionary explanation for morality.

Group selection fails to provide an evolutionary explanation for morality.

L-amino acid enantiomeric excess as an abiogenesis precursor could not have arisen by preferential photo-destruction using circularly polarized light.

Alan Titchmarsh defended well-managed gardens against rewilding campaigns because they better support wildlife, which validates biblical stewardship.

Problems naturalistic evolution faces in providing a basis for objective ethics.

Science is limited in what it can tell us about God, the universe, and the nature of nothing.

However trustworthy our minds are, naturalistic evolution has deep epistemic problems.

A response to the environmentalists’ rewilding agenda, which would devalue people and diminish the quality of human life. Far better, the biblical approach involves stewardship, and respect for creation.

A review of The Demon in the Machine by Paul Davies