Genesis

With eschatological debates, the Bible is still the rule of faith, but with Genesis compromise, science has become the rule of faith.

Darby and the Scofield Reference Bible advocated the Gap theory, which helped old-earth creationism grow among conservative evangelicals.

The evidence shows overwhelmingly that Genesis is an authentic, literal historical record of what actually happened.

Hugh Ross makes excuses for ignoring Refuting Compromise, and claims that YECs have ignored A Matter of Days

Ecosystems functioned somewhat differently before the Fall, but there are biological mechanisms that could have transformed the world post-Fall.

Compromise on Genesis leads to heresy, the doctrine of original sin is just 1 of many things that compromise corrupts.

Are there gaps in the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11?

What did Jesus say about Genesis?

The language of Genesis shows that its history, e.g. the waw consecutive verbs, and thats how the rest of the Bible treats it.

Genesis chapters 1 and 2 are not contradictory; Chapter 1 is an overview and Chapter 2 provides details of Adam and Eve

Genesis portrays God as not only one, but more than one; this is confirmed in the New Testament which states that God created everything through Jesus.

Bible, text, authenticity, F.F. Bruce, Luke, Sir William Ramsay, Resurrection

The seed faith principle does not undermine a literal six-day creation.

Why did Adam have to look among the animals for a helper, if God already knew the outcome?

The dependent clause reading of Genesis 1:1 is not evidence that the Bible is compatible with deep time.

More important than the facts of creation is our Creator!