Genesis

God made huge universe, shown by parallax, needing light years to describe vast distances.

Is the debate about how we should understand Genesis just like disputes about end-times prophecy (eschatology)?

Darby and the Scofield Reference Bible advocated the Gap theory, which helped old-earth creationism grow among conservative evangelicals.

The evidence shows overwhelmingly that Genesis is an authentic, literal historical record of what actually happened.

Hugh Ross makes excuses for ignoring Refuting Compromise, and claims that YECs have ignored A Matter of Days.

How might ecosystem functioning have differed before the Fall?

Compromising on Genesis has far reaching consequences, even for the cross.

Many modern scholars believe that the Genesis genealogies contain gaps and cite fluidity as the reason. What is fluidity and why is it wrong?

Those who insist that Biblical creationists are being divisive over ‘small details’, need to reconsider what Jesus said about Genesis.

The language of Genesis shows that it’s history, and that’s how the rest of the Bible treats it.

Genesis chapters 1 and 2 are not contradictory; Chapter 1 is an overview and Chapter 2 provides details of Adam and Eve

Genesis portrays God as not only one, but more than one; this is confirmed in the New Testament which states that God created everything through Jesus.

Since CMI is based on the Bible, why should the Bible be trusted? Does our current text represent the original, and is the original accurate?

Does the seed faith principle undermine literal six-day creation?

If God knew all along that no animal would be a suitable helper, why bother parading the beasts before Adam?

Does the dependent clause reading of Genesis 1:1 support the compatibility of the Bible with ‘billions of years’?