Dating

Long-age geologists will not accept a radiometric date unless it matches their pre-existing expectations.

If radiometric dating is objective science then why do researchers disagree so widely over the results?

Using the same philosophy (uniformitarianism) employed by evolutionists, the oceans fail to live up to old-earth expectations.

Radiohalos are the result of nuclear decay. They provide powerful evidence that the earth is young and radiometric dating is highly inaccurate.

Western belief in ‘deep time’ first appeared in 17th and 18th century France

The oldest of Egypts pyramids fit comfortably within biblical history and timescale as post-Flood and post-Babel monuments.

Soft tissue preservation in a ‘Jurassic’ ichthyosaur is more evidence that fossils fit the biblical timeframe.

The polymer shield preservation model for soft tissue in fossils has several shortcomings and doesnt explain all the data.

Carbon 14 procedural blanks are not carbon-14 ‘dead’ therefore entire method is suspect.

A graphical tool to transform geological dates into biblical history.

Conflicting radioactive dating results are reported all the time and, on their own, there is no way of knowing what they mean.

Paleozoic corals show banding that supposedly proves the earth had a shorter day in the distant past due to tidal breaking.

A 1997 analysis does not save the grounding for Milankovitch climate forcing.

Assessing the latest date for the Broken Hill skull of Homo heidelbergensis and interpreting the skull from biblical perspective

The rise of deep time in France came over to Britain mainly through methodological naturalism and a subtle undermining of Christianity.

All dating methods involve making assumptions. But many scientific dating methods, with reasonable assumptions, do not support deep time and an old universe. Hundreds of dating methods support a young earth and recent creation of the universe.