Dating methods

The measured exponential decay of Earth

How did these ‘rapid’ fluctuations measured in Antarctic ice cores arise after the Flood?

See how they have been answered many times and understand the key concept to dismiss dating doubts

Claimed dates for the Neolithic site Göbekli Tepe predate the Bible’s date of creation, and the Lost City of Dwarka supposedly predates the Flood—how should creationists respond?

Long-age geologists will not accept a radiometric date unless it matches their pre-existing expectations.

Using the same philosophy (uniformitarianism) employed by evolutionists, the oceans fail to live up to old-earth expectations.

A new way of looking at your world.

Ways they make conflicting results tell the same story

Is the data on which the secular Milankovitch theory of climate forcing saved by a 1997 paper?

Why is Homo heidelbergensis so much younger than previously thought?

The Bible provides the foundations for the answers

When the numbers don’t add up, it’s time to examine the methods and the philosophy behind them.

What is it? And is it evidence against the Bible’s age of the earth?

The 4.5 billion-year radiometric ‘age’ of the earth is based on faulty assumptions even secular researchers have acknowledged.

What is the main reason many scientists believe in an old-Earth? Do most study the science for themselves, or do they simply accept the words of others?

When you peel away the mystery it’s obvious that the dates are not objectively measured.