Dating methods

Radiocarbon in an ‘ancient’ fossil tree stump casts doubt on traditional rock/fossil dating

Evolutionists reject radiometric dates when they conflict with evolutionary fossil dates, such as KBS Tuff pigs and skull 1470.

Separating facts from fiction and data from the dogma regarding claims of accuracy for 14C and dendrochronology dating techniques.

How much nickel is there in the ocean?

Russ Humphreys demolishes criticism of creationist RATE research project Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth

Billions of years of radioactive decay should have produced more helium in our atmosphere; while helium should have escaped zircons.

There are numerous unknowns and inaccuracies in uniformitarian attempts to use microfossils to gauge past climates.

All radioactive dates are based on assumptions so you can get any age you like by changing your assumptions.

Long-age researchers often give exaggerated ages for skeletal remains based on amino acid racemization dating.

Amino acids racemize in water faster than peptides can grow, which undermines abiogenesis.

Conflict over the date of the Mungo Man fossil shows that evolutionists do not automaticcaly accept laboratory dates, but interpret them within an evolutionary framework.

Even many of those who believe that the earth is young think that it looks old. But does it?

Ice core oscillations and abrupt climate changes are better explained within the context of the biblical Ice Age framework.

The salinity of the oceans.

Dating methods rely on assumptions.