Critics

Response to top ten biblical problems for creationism video by YouTube apologist Inspiring Philosophy (Michael Jones).

Paul Price, Dr Robert Carter and Dr John Sanford respond to evolutionist scientists regarding Genetic Entropy.

Avoid a common pitfall: don’t let apologetics become a crutch for your faith. Let it be a steppingstone over doubts.

To trust God again after letting the doubts win, we must

Answering the atheist atrocities fallacy charge, which mentions evil atheistic regimes to counter atheistic arguments about Christians behaving badly.

Neil DeGrasse Tyson misunderstands the nature of God, the problem of evil, and the nature of miracles.

The claim that eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable is investigated and refuted.

Responding to the liberal scholarship on the Behemoth of Job 40, who claim Job 40:17 is a euphemistic reference to a bull’s male organs.

Michael Heiser has a reputation as an Evangelical semitic language scholar, but he departs from Evangelical doctrine in serious ways

Wheaton college professors write a series of books encouraging evangelicals to abandon the biblical understanding of Creation and the Flood as taught by Christ and the NT writers.

Positive and negative apologetic arguments used by Isaiah and Elijah.

Biology looks designed because it is designed; life is not a case of apophenia.

Noahs Ark could not have been a giant coracle as per the translation of a Babylonian tablet by British Museum curator Irving Finkel.

Rebuttal of anti-creationist article by Paul Braterman covering Sahelanthropus, “Evolution is just a theory”, Mike Pence, biogeography, marsupial distributions, mutability, Belyayev tame foxes, and equivocation.

Answering a critic who scolds creationists for being hateful, hampering science, and rejecting evolution.

Atheism\\\\\’s violent legacy overlooked.