Creation Relevance

A review of Understanding Scientific Theories of Origins; a Christian textbook promoting theistic evolution.

Fossilized balls of cells demonstrate cell-cell adhesion and differentiation, providing more evidence for complex multicellularity, one billion years ago.

Mathematics is not racist, but from God’s mind, shown by Fibonacci Sequence, Euler’s equations, Genesis chronogenealogies.

Francis Bacon believed Scripture, but his two books Scripture-science approach eventually undermined Scripture, but Scripture grounds science.

An allusion to Genesis 3 in Romans 6:20–23 links Adams historical sin to Jesus historical sin-bearing death.

Since the Beginning is a biased, liberal history of Genesis interpretion, trying to get around creation in six days.

A review of Biblical Doctrine by John MacArthur and Richard Mayhue (Eds.).

Language processing is pre-wired in the brain, a Catch-22 for evolutionists.

Multiple pieces of evidence support the idea of genetic entropy, but if it is true there is no hope for the human race outside of the second coming of Jesus Christ.

The West African worm Loa loa, cause of the disease Loiasis, does not deserve its infamy.

Popular culture imbues the public with myths and misconceptions about our past. How can creation science help steer the ship?

The billions-of-years age of the earth (hailing from Charles Lyell’s uniformitarianism) is fundamentally atheism’s “bedrock and launch pad”.

Review of Genesis: God, Creation and Destruction by Dennis Prager—a curious mixture of theological liberalism and social conservatism

Why did Noah need animals on the Ark? Old-earth views fall short in explaining this issue.

Would a robotic dog that could make copies of itself be alive?

Electric universe is popular in some circles but CMI does not think it would help promote biblical creation.