Big bang

Experiments on particle physics support the Standard Model, to the chagrin of many big bang advocates.

Big bang theory only appears to be scientific because people are exposed only to the evidence that appears to support it.

The CMB no-shadow argument against the big bang is now equivocal should not be used.

Where is the antimatter from the big bang? Antiprotons are exactly opposite to protons, so would have been produced equally.

The big bang is the atheistic alternative to God as Creator, but it is both scientifically and theologically invalid.

Do dark matter, dark energy, dark radiation, dark flow, dark fluid, dark photons, cosmic Inflation, expanding space, big bang singularity, quantum fluctuations, etc, really explain the universe?

Storytelling, not science, supports big bang, and evolution, as confirmed by leading scientists Paul Steinhardt, James Tour and Denis Noble.

The search for an alternative theory of gravity, the dark matter puzzle and confusing big bang cosmology.

Does the Afshordi, Magueijo faster-speed-of-light theory fix the big bang’s problems?

If Cosmic Microwave Background radiation came from the big bang, we should see shadows from inverse Compton scattering or the Sunyaev--Zeldovich effect as it passes through galaxy clusters, but the predicted shadows are not found.

How are stars formed?

Why do some big bang theorists say universe had no beginning?

Does dark radiation help explain the big bang?

What is the evidence for an expanding universe?

Why have astrophysicists changed their minds over latest big-bang announcement?

Big bang, Bible, cosmic evolution, Scripture, astrophysics, cosmogony, young earth, Universe, cosmology Dr John G. Hartnett discusses how the Bible’s version of events is completely different to big bang cosmogony, in reply to an article by Dr Jeff Zweerink