Apologetics

In wrestling with the overwhelming evidence of design around us, atheists propose explanations somewhere beyond this world; even in imagined other universes.

Wheaton college professors write a series of books encouraging evangelicals to abandon the biblical understanding of Creation and the Flood as taught by Christ and the NT writers.

Psychologist Dr Julia Shaw says our society is ‘post-fact’, and she’s fine with that!

Does CMI just bash evolution? Learn about both the positive and negative arguments in biblical apologetics.

Do faith and facts relate to each other at all? Is there evidence for Christian faith? Yes! A biblical worldview is the best fit for the facts.

Old Testament professor: Genesis 5 and 11 are accurate and gap-free timelines that teach a ~6,000-year-old earth

Is experimental science overrated?

Is there a middle ground between thousands and billions of years? Can the earth be hundreds of thousands of years old?

Life looks like it was designed. Is that impression nothing more than like seeing bunnies in clouds?

Christians and atheists have presuppositions that affect how we interpret facts and evidence.

We humans may think our self-awareness marks us out as special but atheists insist it’s merely an illusion brought about by our brain chemistry. Why, then, do cognitive scientists, psychologists and philosophers fail to explain consciousness?

Taking apart the argument that says consciousness, rather than being a product of the supernatural soul, emerges from the complex physical structure of our brains

Does it give us a timetable? Does it give us the mechanics of how the parts came together?

A Christian advocate of millions of years of death and ‘natural evil’ before Adam is challenged to answer the dilemma this poses, namely that it implies that the Creator God is a moral monster.

Could Noah’s Ark have been a giant coracle, as claimed by British Museum curator Irving Finkel in his translation of a Babylonian tablet?

Evolution, it is claimed, removes the need for a designing intelligence of life on Earth, but this amounts to the logically absurd proposition of ‘Unintelligent Design’.