Anthropology

Charles Darwin’s abhorrence of slavery didn’t have anything to do with his theory of evolution.

Darwin’s racism involved his regarding the Fuegians as ‘miserable animals’ instead of human beings with the skills necessary to survive in their hostile environment.

Louis Leakey abandoned his ambition to be a missionary in Africa, and instead he and his family spent their lives trying to find fossils to prove we evolved from apes.

Are ape-men real?

When we start with the Bible

Darwin

A reanalysis of Australopithecus sedibastill shows that it is not an apeman or missing link but likely to be another variety of australopithecine.

Christopher Columbus described the Fuegians as friendly, and handsome; Darwin compared them to devils and animals. Why the difference?

There is evidence of violence, disease and premature death throughout the human fossil record, so it must be placed after the Fall or the Fall becomes theologically meaningless.

The Denisovans are not pre-human missing links, but a genetically distinct post-Babel people group.

World creation stories affect how societies function and the atheist’s creation story of evolution has proven to be incredibly destructive.

Big Man was labeled Australopithecus afarensis due more to evolutionary dating than morphology, which suggests its human-like.

The Recent African Origins theory cannot explain human origins because it assumes the Standard Neutral Model of evolution, which cannot mimic real-world mutation and natural selection rates.

Sequencing of Neandertal mitochondrial genome suggests Sequencing of Neandertal mitochondrial genome suggests that Neandertals are outside the range of modern human variation but this does not necessarily conflict with the creationist position that Neandertals lived after the Flood and are fully human.

Homo gautengensis is the latest apeman on the scene, which has been cobbled together from from disparate pieces of Homo habilis but ends up more like Australopithecus.

Native American creation and flood stories and so called Indian creation myths share a common unity with the book of Genesis.