Podcasts

Is there objective evidence that God exists? Can we know God personally? Yes!

Creationists Dr Robert Carter and Keaton Halley discuss evidence for evolution, like changes in living things, human/chimp DNA similarity, and the fossil record. How do creationists account for these facts and answer evolutionary arguments?

In the last half century the Doctrine of Sin appears to have become a doctrine under attack in theological circles, but this has largely gone unnoticed. This podcast aims to show how in various ways the classical doctrine has been challenged.

Vaccination is an extremely safe and extremely effective means of preventing diseases that once killed millions, and is good operational science. The benefits strongly outweigh the risks for the vast majority of people. The Bible commends alleviation of the effects of the Curse, especially by Christ’s examples of healing the sick and disabled.

Radiohalos are the result of nuclear decay. They provide powerful evidence that the earth is young and radiometric dating is highly inaccurate.

The number of organs that once were believed to be functional in the evolutionary past of humans but are non-functional today has been steadily reduced as the fields of anatomy and physiology have progressed. Few examples of vestigial organs in humans are now offered, and the ones that are have been shown by more recent research to be completely functional, and in many cases critically so.

Polystrate fossils are those that extend through multiple rock layers. Learn how these fossils support the Bible’s teaching about Noah’s Flood.

The public education system only endorses one view of origins. Would it be better if the scientific evidence for creation was also taught? Would it be more 'fair?

Skeptics claim that the fossil record is a good and relatively complete picture of the development of life on earth with little or no exceptions. But is that the case?

Genesis 6 records that the sons of God and the daughters of men produced the Nephilim. Several views are presented on the identity of the Nephilim.

‘All those scientists’ can be wrong — and often have been! The reason hoaxes dominated textbooks for many decades as the chief evidence for man’s evolution is not because of a mistake, a small aberration somewhere along the line of a self-correcting march towards truth, but because of the strong influences of presupposition and prejudice.

Many in the general public will be duped into thinking that this undisputed example of natural selection is yet more evidence that fish turned into philosophers over millions of years. Beware the bait-and-switch.

The Paluxy tracks are a series of tracks in Glen Rose, Texas, that supposedly show dinosaur and human footprints in sedimentary rock. Is this good evidence that humans and dinosaurs once lived together?

Some Christians believe in evolution. Does this mean they are not Christians? Scientists and theologians are interviewed to answer this question.

Everyone will have an opportunity to accept or reject Christ, right? But down through history, and even today, there are people who have never of of the Bible, Jesus Christ, or had that opportunity. Here are a few principles which help us to think through this difficult issue.

The human genome is much more complex than anyone imagined. In fact, the level of complexity argues directly against any sort of evolutionary origin for the code that makes us.