God inspired the Bible as completely accurate. So why does He allow us to have different opinions?

Why would the women take spices to the tomb when Jesus was entombed with 75 pounds of spices?

We respond to a number of comments critical of ‘science-rejecting’ creationists.

Did Eve transition from a single bone to a 206-bone human? What about the transition from molecules to man?

An extra copy of a gene is new information, but not a new kind of information – evolution still doesn’t happen!

Multiple arguments against biblical creation are answered: dating, DNA similarities, evidence for Noah’s Flood, feasibility of the Ark.

A reader claims that we were unfair in our assessment of another Christian’s research. We respond.

Genesis 1 is history, not poetry, and speaks more how long God took to create than how God created.

God sending His Son to save us is a natural outpouring of His essentially loving and merciful character.

A touching testimony shows why we do what we do.

Why CMI talks about theology as well as science.

Stem cell-like ancestors of sponges only make early life more complex, and the probability of evolution less likely

Since Jesus taught a historical Genesis, we should believe Him.

A skeptic says that creation is fictional because we haven’t proved that God exists. Is he right?

Is there such a thing as “the best scientific evidence for creation or a young earth”? Soft tissue in dino bones, carbon-14 in diamonds, big bang problems.

A critic says creation isn’t science. How would you respond?