Are there some evidences for creation that are more effective than others?

The Flood was an expression of God’s just wrath against sin.

Could thorns have existed outside of Eden? What about the Framework Hypothesis? And how certain are we that Genesis 1:1–2:3 is history?

The Bible provides the foundations for the answers

Do all scientists believe in an old earth? The fatal flaws of radioactive and tree-ring dating and the flat earth myth.

Instead, it grounds the life-giving message of the Gospel in history.

Should CMI give equal airtime to ‘billions of years’ ideas at our meetings?

Were Paul’s letters coauthored? And are the resurrection accounts really plausible?

A friend of the ministry asks, didn’t Jesus and Paul use nasty language toward their opponents? We give an answer.

Can the Hebrew word ‘bara’ be translated as re-create and did God re-create this world based on an previously existing Earth?

Abortion is wrong. But some women can’t afford a baby. How would you respond?

No proof for evolution—Archaeotherium pre-Flood pig, and Onychonycteris turns out to be yet another species of bat.

God inspired the Bible as completely accurate. So why does He allow us to have different opinions?

A reader asks: Why would the women take spices to the tomb when Jesus was entombed with 75 pounds of spices? How would you respond?

We respond to a number of comments critical of ‘science-rejecting’ creationists.

Did Eve transition from a single bone to a 206-bone human? What about the transition from molecules to man?